The Effects of Values, Work Centrality, and Organizational Commitment on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Evidence from Turkish SMEs

Organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) are voluntary contributions of employees not explicitly recognized by the formal reward system and are ultimately critical for sustaining organizational effectiveness (Organ, 1988). The current study aims to investigate the effects of values, work centrali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human resource development quarterly Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 89 - 129
Main Authors: Ucanok, Basak, Karabati, Serdar
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: San Francisco Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-03-2013
Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) are voluntary contributions of employees not explicitly recognized by the formal reward system and are ultimately critical for sustaining organizational effectiveness (Organ, 1988). The current study aims to investigate the effects of values, work centrality, and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviors in small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) in Turkey. It is predicted that work centrality, and affective and normative commitment will increase OCBs along with those values that correspond to OCBs in terms of content. A cross‐sectional survey was employed with a convenience sample of 277 SME employees. Data were collected in the midst of the 2008 global financial crisis, which allowed for elaboration on the dynamics of OCBs under difficult periods. The analyses revealed that affective commitment and normative commitment were strong predictors of OCBs. Sportsmanship dimension of citizenship was found to be a function of conservation values, work centrality, and both affective and normative commitment. Findings and suggestions for future research are discussed in light of recent OCB literature and a general HRD perspective.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-97GP09S3-W
ArticleID:HRDQ21156
istex:77304E807C1E58077B03DD63F0D9F18F47BE7AF0
ISSN:1044-8004
1532-1096
DOI:10.1002/hrdq.21156