Futzing and Moseying: Interviews with Professional Data Analysts on Exploration Practices

We report the results of interviewing thirty professional data analysts working in a range of industrial, academic, and regulatory environments. This study focuses on participants' descriptions of exploratory activities and tool usage in these activities. Highlights of the findings include: dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 22 - 31
Main Authors: Alspaugh, Sara, Zokaei, Nava, Liu, Andrea, Jin, Cindy, Hearst, Marti A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States IEEE 01-01-2019
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We report the results of interviewing thirty professional data analysts working in a range of industrial, academic, and regulatory environments. This study focuses on participants' descriptions of exploratory activities and tool usage in these activities. Highlights of the findings include: distinctions between exploration as a precursor to more directed analysis versus truly open-ended exploration; confirmation that some analysts see "finding something interesting" as a valid goal of data exploration while others explicitly disavow this goal; conflicting views about the role of intelligent tools in data exploration; and pervasive use of visualization for exploration, but with only a subset using direct manipulation interfaces. These findings provide guidelines for future tool development, as well as a better understanding of the meaning of the term "data exploration" based on the words of practitioners "in the wild".
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1077-2626
1941-0506
DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865040