Thinning intensity effects on carbon and nitrogen stores and fluxes in a Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand after 33 years

The present paper deals with C and N storage in soil and vegetation, litter fall and CO 2 efflux from the soil 32–33 years after early thinning in a Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand in order to evaluate the effect of thinning regime on C sequestration. At 22 years old, the stand was re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forest ecology and management Vol. 256; no. 3; pp. 201 - 208
Main Authors: Nilsen, P., Strand, L.T.
Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 30-07-2008
[Amsterdam]: Elsevier Science
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present paper deals with C and N storage in soil and vegetation, litter fall and CO 2 efflux from the soil 32–33 years after early thinning in a Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand in order to evaluate the effect of thinning regime on C sequestration. At 22 years old, the stand was reduced from 3190 to 2070, 1100 and 820 trees per hectare in four replicates. The N2070 treatment represents the recommended start density in practical forestry, while the other represent a moderate to large reduction in tree number at the present stand age. Aboveground biomass was estimated from single tree measurements of diameter and height based on allometric functions. Litter fall was collected during one and a half years and soil respiration was measured on five occasions during one summer. Ground vegetation was mapped and sampled for biomass, C and N determination. A significant decrease in aboveground tree (including stump-root system) C storage of 27% and 22% due to thinning was found in the N820 and N1100 treatments, respectively, compared to the N2070 treatment. Ground vegetation C storage was little affected by treatment, while litter fall C showed a non-significant decrease in the N820 and N1100 treatments compared to the N2070 treatment. Soil respiration was significantly lower in parts of the summer in the N2070 treatment compared to the N820 treatment. The reason for this is still unexplained since no differences in soil temperature, soil moisture or litter fall chemistry was found between the treatments. No significant treatment effects on humus and mineral soil C storage could be detected. With the present soil variability, the time period of 32 years is probably too short to detect soil C differences due to thinning. The N storage followed the same pattern as for C.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.001
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-1127
1872-7042
DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.001