Who can Really be Called a Lexicographer?

• Published in: Lexikos Vol. 22; no. 22; pp. 217 - 225
• Main Author: Gouws, Rufus H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Stellenbosch Buro van die Woordeboek van die Afrikaanse Taal (Bureau of the WAT) 01-01-2012; Woordeboek van die Afrikaanse Taal-WAT
• Subjects: Definitions; Dictionaries; emlex; lexicographer; lexicographic practice; lexicographic process; lexicographic research; lexicographic training; Lexicography; metalexicographer; practical lexicographer; primary lexicographer; secondary lexicographer; South Africa
• ISSN: 1684-4904; 2224-0039
• DOI: 10.5788/22-1-1004

Lexicographers define words but still lack a clear and unambiguous understanding of the word lexicographer. This paper gives a brief discussion of the problems experienced in trying to determine exactly what a lexicographer is. The distinction between theoretical and practical lexicographers is quite clear but within both these categories there are grey areas where it is not so clear whether a specific participant in lexicographic activities qualifies to be called a lexicographer. The lack of formal professional lexicographic qualifications impedes an unambiguous understanding of the word. The emergence of lexicography as an independent discipline compels lexicographers to take a closer look at criteria relevant to identifying someone as being a lexicographer. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]