Urine testing to monitor adherence to TB preventive therapy

This study examined the validity of the Arkansas urine test. One hundred ninety-four adolescents submitted an unannounced urine specimen monthly (for 6 to 8 months). Duplicate specimens were blindly tested with high agreement (kappa >90%). Sensitivity and specificity were estimated. In 68% of tes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 235 - 238
Main Authors: Perry, Sharon, Hovell, Melbourne F., Blumberg, Elaine, Berg, Jill, Vera, Alicia, Sipan, Carol, Kelley, Norma, Moser, Kathleen, Catanzaro, Antonino, Friedman, Larry
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-03-2002
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examined the validity of the Arkansas urine test. One hundred ninety-four adolescents submitted an unannounced urine specimen monthly (for 6 to 8 months). Duplicate specimens were blindly tested with high agreement (kappa >90%). Sensitivity and specificity were estimated. In 68% of test runs, adolescents recalled taking INH within 24 hr of specimen collection. For recall intervals of 24, 48, and 72 hr, sensitivity was 87, 85, and 83%, respectively. Females were less likely to test positive when INH was taken within the previous 24 hr (sensitivity 84 versus 92% males). Specificity was 57, 91, and 95% at 24, 48, and 72 hr, respectively. The Arkansas urine test was practical to use, and results correlated well with self-reported adherence to INH for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), over several months of follow-up. The test may be useful as part of an adherence-monitoring program when used in conjunction with self-reported measures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00470-X