Mortality versus survival in drought‐affected Aleppo pine forest depends on the extent of rock cover and soil stoniness

• Published in: Functional ecology Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 901 - 912
• Main Authors: Preisler, Yakir, Tatarinov, Fyodor, Grünzweig, José M., Bert, Didier, Ogée, Jérôme, Wingate, Lisa, Rotenberg, Eyal, Rohatyn, Shani, Her, Nir, Moshe, Itzhak, Klein, Tamir, Yakir, Dan, Sala, Anna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-05-2019; Wiley
• Subjects: Aridity; Chlorophyll; Computer simulation; Coniferous forests; Drought; Dry season; Drying; Environmental Sciences; Forests; Heterogeneity; Hydrologic data; Hydrology; Leaves; Life Sciences; Moisture content; Mortality; Pine needles; Pine trees; Rocks; semi‐arid; soil moisture; Soil profiles; Soil properties; Soil water; stoniness; surface rock cover; Survival; Timberline; Transpiration; tree rings; Trees; Trends; Water potential; Wilting; Wilting point; Yatir Forest; surface rock cover; stoniness; semi-arid; soil moisture; Yatir Forest; tree rings
• ISSN: 0269-8463; 1365-2435
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13302

Drought‐related tree mortality had become a widespread phenomenon in forests around the globe. This process leading to these events and its complexity is not fully understood. Trees in the dry timberline are exposed to ongoing drought, and the available water for transpiration in the soil can determine their survival chances.
Recent drought years led to 5%–10% mortality in the semi‐arid pine forest of Yatir (Israel). The distribution of dead trees was, however, highly heterogeneous with parts of the forest showing >80% dead trees (D plots) and others with mostly live trees (L plots). At the tree level, visible stress was associated with low pre‐dawn leaf water potential at the dry season (−2.8 MPa vs. −2.3 MPa in non‐stressed trees), shorter needles (5.5 vs. 7.7 mm) and lower chlorophyll content (0.6 vs. 1 mg/g dw). Trends in tree‐ring widths reflected differences in stress intensity (30% narrower rings in stressed compared with unstressed trees), which could be identified 15–20 years prior to mortality.
At the plot scale, no differences in topography, soil type, tree age or stand density could explain the mortality difference between the D and L plots. It could only be explained by the higher surface rock cover and in stoniness across the soil profile in the L plots. Simple bucket model simulations using the site’s long‐term hydrological data supported the idea that these differences could result in higher soil water concentration (m3/m3) in the L plots and extend the time above wilting point by several months across the long dry season.
Accounting for subsurface heterogeneity may therefore critical to assessing stand‐level response to drought and projecting tree survival, and can be used in management strategies in regions undergoing drying climate trends.
A plain language summary is available for this article.
Plain Language Summary