Two-year minimum survivorship and radiographic analysis of a pressfit short humeral stem for total shoulder arthroplasty

• Published in: JSES international Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 191 - 196
• Main Authors: Larose, Gabriel, Aibinder, William R, Greene, Alexander T, Roche, Christopher P, Grey, Sean, Faber, Kenneth J, Routman, Howard, Antuña, Samuel, Wright, Thomas, Flurin, Pierre-Henri, Zuckerman, Joseph D, Virk, Mandeep S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier 01-01-2024
• Subjects: Canal filling; Radiographic outcomes; Short stem; Shoulder; Stress shielding; Total shoulder arthroplasty; Stress shielding; Radiographic outcomes; Total shoulder arthroplasty; Short stem; Canal filling
• ISSN: 2666-6383; 2666-6383
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.10.011

Newer generation humeral stem designs in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are trending towards shorter lengths and uncemented fixation. The goal of this study is to report a 2-yr minimum clinical and radiographic outcomes of an uncemented short-stem press-fit humeral stem in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).
A retrospective multicenter database review was performed of all patients who received an uncemented short-length press-fit humeral stem (Equinoxe Preserve humeral stem, Exactech, Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA) in ATSA and RTSA with a minimum two-year follow-up. The primary outcome was the prevalence of humeral stems at risk of radiographic loosening. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of functional outcome scores and prevalence of revision TSA for humeral stem loosening. Two blinded observers performed radiographic analyses, which included humeral stem alignment, canal filling ratio, radiolucent lines, stress shielding (calcar and greater tuberosity), and changes in component position (subsidence and stem shift). At risk stems were defined by the presence of one or more of the following: humeral stem with shifting or subsidence, scalloping of the humeral cortex, or radiolucent lines measuring 2 mm or greater in 3 or more zones.
287 patients (97 ATSA and 190 RTSA) were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 35.9 (±6.1) months. There were significant improvements for all functional outcome scores (
 < .05), range of motion (
 < .05), and visual analogue pain scale pain (
 < .05). The prevalence of humeral stem at risk of radiographic loosening was 1% in the ATSA group (1/97) and 18.4% in the RTSA group (35/190). Calcar resorption was seen in 34% of ATSA and 19% of RTSA, with severe resorption in 12.4% of ATSA and only 3.2% of RTSA. Greater tuberosity resorption was present in 3.1% of ATSA and 7.9% of RTSA. The mean canal filling ratio was 50.2% (standard deviation 11.2%). Using logistic regression, a significant positive correlation between canal filling ratio and stress shielding (
 < .01) was seen for both calcar and tuberosity stress shielding. The revision surgery rate was 0% in ATSA compared to 1.6% in RTSA.
This retrospective study demonstrates a low revision rate and low prevalence of humeral stems at risk of radiographic loosening at two years with a press-fit short-stem humeral design in ATSA. Physiologic subsidence of humeral stems can account for higher prevalence of humeral stems at radiographic risk of loosening in RTSA compared to ATSA.