Personal assistance for people with physical disabilities: consumer-direction and satisfaction with services

To determine whether people who receive consumer-directed personal assistance services (PAS) are more satisfied with the services they receive than those receiving PAS that are not consumer-directed. A quasi-experimental survey comparison of long-term outcomes among people receiving consumer-directe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 79; no. 6; p. 674
Main Authors: Beatty, P W, Richmond, G W, Tepper, S, DeJong, G
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01-06-1998
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To determine whether people who receive consumer-directed personal assistance services (PAS) are more satisfied with the services they receive than those receiving PAS that are not consumer-directed. A quasi-experimental survey comparison of long-term outcomes among people receiving consumer-directed PAS in Virginia and persons on the waiting list to receive those services. Surveys were conducted by mail and telephone. The general community in Virginia. Ninety-two Virginia residents with physical disabilities living in the community. Sixty individuals were receiving consumer-directed PAS, and 32 were on the waiting list for consumer-directed PAS and were receiving paid personal assistance that was not consumer-directed. The Personal Assistance Satisfaction Index (PASI); chi2 and t tests were conducted. People receiving consumer-directed PAS scored significantly higher on the PASI than the waiting-list control group and were consistently more likely to report high levels of satisfaction on the majority of individual PASI items. Consumer-directed PAS are associated with high levels of satisfaction relative to PAS that are not consumer-directed. Individual PASI items related to control over PAS and flexibility of services showed the greatest differences in satisfaction.
ISSN:0003-9993
DOI:10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90043-0