Analysis of false-positive BTA stat test results in patients followed up for bladder cancer

Objectives. To evaluate the role of a positive BTA stat Test result in patients with negative cystoscopic findings. Methods. Five hundred one consecutive patients in follow-up for bladder cancer were studied. A voided urine sample was obtained before cystoscopy and split for culture, cytology, and B...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) Vol. 57; no. 4; pp. 680 - 684
Main Authors: Raitanen, Mika-P, Kaasinen, Eero, Lukkarinen, Olavi, Kauppinen, Risto, Viitanen, Jouko, Liukkonen, Tapani, Tammela, Teuvo L.J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-04-2001
Elsevier Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives. To evaluate the role of a positive BTA stat Test result in patients with negative cystoscopic findings. Methods. Five hundred one consecutive patients in follow-up for bladder cancer were studied. A voided urine sample was obtained before cystoscopy and split for culture, cytology, and BTA stat testing. In the case of a positive BTA stat Test, but negative cystoscopic findings, patients underwent additional investigations. Results. Of 501 patients, 133 (26.5%) had bladder cancer recurrence at cystoscopy, of which the BTA stat Test detected 71 (53.4%); only 21 of the cases (17.9%) were detected by cytologic examination. Of the remaining 368 patients with no visible tumor at cystoscopy, 96 (26.1%) had a positive BTA stat Test result. Fifty-five of those (57.3%) underwent intravenous urography or renal ultrasound and random biopsies, and an additional 9 recurrences (16.4%) were detected. Of those 46 patients who had a true false-positive BTA stat Test, 3 (3 of 43, 7.0%) had recurrence at the next follow-up cystoscopy, 4 (8.7%) had a urine infection, and 8 (17.4%) had ongoing intravesical instillations; the latter two percentages were significantly higher than among those with true-negative BTA stat Test results (0% and 6.8%, respectively). Conclusions. Patients with a positive BTA stat Test result but negative cystoscopic findings have about a 16% risk of an undetected recurrence. False-positive results may be due to present instillation treatment and urine infection, and the predictive value of a BTA stat Test for subsequent recurrence seems relatively low.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(00)01055-4