Suture anchor strength revisited

• Published in: Arthroscopy Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 32
• Main Authors: Barber, F A, Herbert, M A, Click, J N
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-02-1996
• Subjects: Animals; Arthroscopes; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Screws; Endoscopes; Equipment Design; Equipment Failure; Joints - surgery; Ligaments, Articular - injuries; Ligaments, Articular - surgery; Models, Anatomic; Suture Techniques - instrumentation; Swine; Tendon Injuries; Tendons - surgery
• ISSN: 0749-8063
• DOI: 10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90216-9

The rapid proliferation of suture anchors continues. Our prior report on the pullout strength of 14 different anchors is supplemented by a similar test conducted on 8 additional anchors. Comparative data on modes of failure and failure strengths (ultimate loads to failure) for these new devices are compared statistically with the previously tested anchors. In a fresh never-frozen porcine femur model, 10 samples of each of the additional anchors tested were threaded with stainless steel sutures and inserted into three different test areas (diaphyseal cortex, metaphyseal cortex, and a cancellous trough). Tensile stress parallel to the axis of insertion was applied at a rate of 12.5 mm/s by an Instron 1321 testing machine (Instron Corp, Canton, MA) until failure and mean anchor failure strengths calculated. The anchors tested were the Mitek G2 as a control, miniMitek, Mitek Superanchor, Mitek Rotator Cuff anchor (Mitek Products, Westwood, MA), Innovasive Devices Radial Osteal Compression device (Innovasive Devices, Hopkinton, MA), Arthrex Fastak (Arthrex Inc, Naples, FL), Arthrotek miniHarpoon (Arthrotek, Warsaw, IN), Orthopedic Biosystems PeBA 3 and PeBA 5 (Orthopedic Biosystems, Scottsdale, AZ), and AME 5.5 screw (American Medical Electronics, Richardson, TX). Failure mode (anchor pullout, suture eyelet cut out, or wire breakage) was generally consistent for each anchor type. The size of insertion hole is clinically important and each anchor's performance was evaluated as a function of its minor diameter or drill hole. For screw anchors, the larger the minor diameter of the screw, the higher the mean failure strengths in all three test areas (P = .001). However, larger drill holes for non-screw anchors resulted in lower mean failure strengths in cancellous bone (P = .03) and diaphyseal cortex (P < .005).