Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful?

As part of a learning exercise to assess the efficiency of oocyte utilization after controlled ovarian stimulation, we compared historical data from the publications of Steptoe and Edwards describing their early experiences in Oldham and at Bourn Hall with retrospective data from IVF and ICSI cycles...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 588 - 592
Main Authors: Inge, George B., Brinsden, Peter R., Elder, Kay T.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-03-2005
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As part of a learning exercise to assess the efficiency of oocyte utilization after controlled ovarian stimulation, we compared historical data from the publications of Steptoe and Edwards describing their early experiences in Oldham and at Bourn Hall with retrospective data from IVF and ICSI cycles carried out at Bourn Hall Clinic during the year 2000. For the purpose of analysing the more recent data, patients were subdivided into groups by age (≤37 years and ≥38 years) and by oocyte yield (low, intermediate and high). In patients less than 38 years of age, live birth rates were equivalent in each group, irrespective of the number of oocytes retrieved. Patients who yielded low numbers of oocytes (1–5) utilized an average of 9.6 oocytes per live birth, compared with 25.1 and 51.5 in those who yielded intermediate (6–16) and high (16+) numbers of oocytes. The comparison with historical data suggests that the ‘efficiency’ of oocyte utilization has not improved significantly since the early 1980s, despite 25 years' experience of controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF treatment.
Bibliography:3To whom correspondence should be addressed at. The Center for Reproductive Medicine, Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, 3 Mobile Infirmary Circle, Suite 213, Mobile, AL 36607, USA. Email: GIngel10216@aol.com
istex:626211894721482C3C65F4D8A48A5306C772BC8F
local:deh655
ark:/67375/HXZ-SJGPSGKX-F
href:deh655.pdf
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh655