Cardiorespiratory Responses to Downhill Versus Uphill Running in Endurance Athletes

Purpose: Mountain running races are becoming increasingly popular, although our understanding of the particular physiology associated with downhill running (DR) in trained athletes remains scarce. This study explored the cardiorespiratory responses to high-slope constant velocity uphill running (UR)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research quarterly for exercise and sport Vol. 89; no. 4; pp. 511 - 517
Main Authors: Lemire, Marcel, Lonsdorfer-Wolf, Evelyne, Isner-Horobeti, Marie-Eve, Kouassi, Blah Y. L., Geny, Bernard, Favret, Fabrice, Dufour, Stéphane P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Routledge 02-10-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: Mountain running races are becoming increasingly popular, although our understanding of the particular physiology associated with downhill running (DR) in trained athletes remains scarce. This study explored the cardiorespiratory responses to high-slope constant velocity uphill running (UR) and DR. Method: Eight endurance athletes performed a maximal incremental test and 2 15-min running bouts (UR, +15%, or DR, −15%) at the same running velocity (8.5 ± 0.4 km·h −1 ). Oxygen uptake ( O 2 ), heart rate (HR), and ventilation rates ( E ) were continuously recorded, and blood lactate (bLa) was measured before and after each trial. Results: Downhill running induced a more superficial E pattern featuring reduced tidal volume (p < .05, ES = 6.05) but similar respiratory frequency (p > .05, ES = 0.68) despite lower E (p < .05, ES = 5.46), O 2 (p < .05, ES = 12.68), HR (p < .05, ES = 6.42), and bLa (p < .05, ES = 1.70). A negative slow component was observed during DR for O 2 (p < .05, ES = 1.72) and HR (p < .05, ES = 0.80). Conclusions: These results emphasize the cardiorespiratory responses to DR and highlight the need for cautious interpretation of O 2 , HR, and E patterns as markers of exercise intensity for training load prescription and management.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0270-1367
2168-3824
DOI:10.1080/02701367.2018.1510172