Salmonella detection in poultry meat and meat products by the Vitek immunodiagnostic assay system easy Salmonella method, a LightCycler polymerase chain reaction system, and the International Organization for Standardization method 6579

• Published in: Poultry science Vol. 91; no. 3; pp. 724 - 731
• Main Authors: Temelli, S, Eyigor, A, Carli, K. T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Poultry Science Association 01-03-2012
• Subjects: Animals; detection limit; DNA, Bacterial - chemistry; DNA, Bacterial - genetics; Food Microbiology; Immunoenzyme Techniques - methods; Immunoenzyme Techniques - standards; Immunoenzyme Techniques - veterinary; international organizations; Limit of Detection; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods; Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards; Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary; Poultry; poultry meat; Poultry Products - microbiology; quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Reproducibility of Results; Salmonella; Salmonella - genetics; Salmonella - isolation & purification; Salmonella Infections - prevention & control; screening; Sensitivity and Specificity
• ISSN: 0032-5791; 1525-3171
• DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01863

This study was conducted to evaluate the capability of the Vitek immunodiagnostic assay system easy Salmonella (VIDAS ESLM) method and a specific real-time PCR system (LightCycler, LCPCR) to complement the International Organization for Standardization Method 6579 (ISO) in detecting Salmonella from a total of 105 naturally contaminated samples comprised of poultry meat and poultry meat products. The detection limit of ISO and LCPCR was 9 cfu/mL for both poultry meat and poultry meat products, whereas that of VIDAS ESLM with both sample types was determined to be 90 cfu/mL. Twelve (33.33%), 11 (30.55%), and 18 (50.00%) out of 36 poultry meat samples were positive for Salmonella by ISO, VIDAS ESLM, and LCPCR, respectively. Salmonella detection rates from poultry meat products were 5.80% for ISO and 8.69% for LCPCR, whereas none of these products tested positive by VIDAS ESLM. In poultry meat samples, VIDAS ESLM and LCPCR detection results were in substantial agreement with ISO, with the relative accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates of 97.2, 91.7, and 100%, respectively, for VIDAS ESLM and 83.3, 100, and 75%, respectively, for LCPCR. This is the first report on the evaluation of both VIDAS ESLM and LCPCR to complement ISO for the rapid detection of Salmonella in poultry meat and meat products. We determined that both VIDAS ESLM and LCPCR have the potential to complement the ISO standard culture method in the rapid screening of Salmonella from naturally contaminated poultry meats. For the poultry meat products, VIDAS ESLM and LCPCR can be used for rapid primary screening, and they should be complemented absolutely by ISO. Although LCPCR can preferentially be used for initial screening poultry meat products, the results should definitely be confirmed by ISO. Also, the VIDAS ESLM did not seem to be a suitable method for detecting Salmonella in poultry meat products.