Predictors of response following standardized education and self-management recommendations for low back pain stratified by dominant pain location

• Published in: North American Spine Society journal (NASSJ) Vol. 8; p. 100092
• Main Authors: Perruccio, Anthony V., Wong, Jessica T.Y., Badley, Elizabeth M., Power, J. Denise, Yip, Calvin, Rampersaud, Y. Raja
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 01-12-2021; Elsevier
• Subjects: Back-dominant; Clinical Study; Leg-dominant; Low back pain; Model of care; Primary care; prospective; Risk assessment; Back-dominant; Model of care; Low back pain; Risk assessment; Primary care; prospective; Leg-dominant
• ISSN: 2666-5484; 2666-5484
• DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100092

Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability globally. Risk-stratification systems (e.g. STarT Back) have been proposed to guide treatment, but with varying success. We investigated factors associated with poor response to standardized LBP education and self-management recommendations stratified by dominant pain location (back or leg).
LBP patients underwent a standardized primary care model of care of education and self-management recommendations. Poor response was defined as an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) change score <10 units by 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify poor response risk factors, stratified by back-dominant and leg-dominant back pain. Baseline factors: age, sex, body mass index, ODI, LBP/leg-pain intensity, LBP/leg-pain duration, STarT Back chronicity-risk, smoking, comorbidity count, and self-efficacy.
The sample consisted of 767 patients (443 back-dominant, 324 leg-dominant). Mean age was 53 years, and 59% were female. Females accounted for 66% of back-dominant and 50% of leg-dominant patients. Chronicity risk was ‘high’ for 18% of back-dominant and 29% of leg-dominant patients. Poor response was higher in back- (57%) compared to leg-dominant (42%) patients. Adjusted stratified analyses: female sex, moderate or high chronicity-risk, and increasing age were associated with increased risk of poor response, and greater self-efficacy with favourable response, in leg-dominant patients; these were not the cases among back-dominant patients. Increased comorbidity count was associated with poor response in back dominant patients. In both patient groups, higher baseline ODI score was associated with favorable response, and smoking and longer pain duration with poor response.
Differences in the influence of sex and chronicity risk in particular on outcome by dominant pain location suggests that considering these patients as a single group may not be appropriate. Furthermore, findings suggest that stratification by pain dominance may enhance the use of established risk stratification tools such as the STarT Back.