Methylisothiazolinone allergic contact dermatitis: Assessment of relapses in 139 patients after avoidance advice

Background Methylisothiazolinone (MI) is a preservative that is responsible for an epidemic of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Few studies have been published on the prognosis of patients with MI‐induced ACD. Objectives To evaluate relapses of MI‐induced ACD and difficulties in avoiding MI in pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contact dermatitis Vol. 80; no. 5; pp. 304 - 310
Main Authors: Bouschon, Pauline, Waton, Julie, Pereira, Bruno, Schmutz, Jean‐Luc, Bouëdec, Marie‐Christine F., D'Incan, Michel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-05-2019
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Methylisothiazolinone (MI) is a preservative that is responsible for an epidemic of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Few studies have been published on the prognosis of patients with MI‐induced ACD. Objectives To evaluate relapses of MI‐induced ACD and difficulties in avoiding MI in patients who had received avoidance advice. Methods A retrospective study of patients with MI‐induced ACD diagnosed in two specialized dermato‐allergology units between 2010 and 2015 was performed. The median follow‐up was 3 years. Results Relapses were observed in 64% of 139 included patients, and were severe in 18%. Rinse‐off cosmetics were responsible for the largest proportion of relapses (27%). The median time to relapse was 5 months. Sixty‐nine per cent of relapses were on the hands, and 29% were on the face. Risk factors for relapsing were hand eczema and a personal history of atopy. The main difficulties encountered in the avoidance strategy were hidden sources of MI, the lack of labelling on industrial products, the complexity of cosmetic labelling, and remembering the name of the allergen. Conclusion MI‐induced ACD has a poor prognosis. Its high rate of relapse is mainly attributable to the difficulties of avoidance. Management needs to be improved. Specialized follow‐up in the year following diagnosis is essential to educate patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0105-1873
1600-0536
DOI:10.1111/cod.13221