Effects of venous return reduction in hypertensive patients: is there a Doppler diastolic dysfunction index independent of preload reduction?

• Published in: The American heart journal Vol. 123; no. 5; p. 1299
• Main Authors: Castini, D, Mangiarotti, E, Vitolo, E, Conconi, B, Triulzi, M O
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-05-1992
• Subjects: Adult; Blood Flow Velocity; Blood Pressure - physiology; Diastole - physiology; Echocardiography; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging; Heart Ventricles - physiopathology; Humans; Hypertension - diagnostic imaging; Hypertension - physiopathology; Male; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging; Mitral Valve - physiology; Mitral Valve - physiopathology; Regional Blood Flow; Ventricular Function; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology
• ISSN: 0002-8703
• DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)91037-2

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of preload reduction on the Doppler transmitral flow pattern in the presence of diastolic dysfunction (hypertensive patients) and normal diastolic function (normal subjects) to identify, if present, one or more indexes of abnormal diastolic ventricular filling independent of variations in preload. For this purpose Doppler echocardiography was performed in 17 patients with hypertension and in 18 normal subjects under basal conditions and after 5 minutes of blood pressure cuff inflation at the root of the four limbs. The two groups showed a similar response to preload reduction: a significant reduction in peak velocity and the time-velocity integral of the E wave and in the ratio of peak velocities of E and A waves. Therefore the differences in left ventricular filling patterns between hypertensive and normal subjects observed under basal conditions were still present after preload reduction. The comparison between normal subjects after preload reduction and hypertensive patients in the basal state showed a higher peak velocity and time-velocity integral of the A wave in the latter (61.2 +/- 16.2 vs 46.2 +/- 9 cm/sec [p less than 0.002] and 5.4 +/- 1.8 vs 3.7 +/- 1 cm [p less than 0.002], respectively) with no differences in the ratios of peak velocities and time-velocity integrals of the E and A waves.