Failure strengths of different meniscal suturing techniques
The aim of this study was to measure the failure strengths of three arthroscopic meniscal suturing methods. The techniques investigated were a single horizontal loop, a double vertical loop, and a single vertical loop. Eleven human, lateral menisci obtained at autopsy were cut with a scalpel to simu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Arthroscopy Vol. 11; no. 2; p. 146 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
01-04-1995
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get more information |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The aim of this study was to measure the failure strengths of three arthroscopic meniscal suturing methods. The techniques investigated were a single horizontal loop, a double vertical loop, and a single vertical loop. Eleven human, lateral menisci obtained at autopsy were cut with a scalpel to simulate peripheral longitudinal tears. The menisci were then repaired with one suture at a time, using each of the three methods in turn. The two parts of the meniscus were then pulled apart using a computer-controlled materials testing machine until failure occurred, either by the suture itself failing or by the suture pulling out because of tearing of the meniscus. The horizontal sutures had a mean failure strength of 29.3 N, whereas the double vertical loop failed at 63.2 N and the single vertical loop at 67.3 N. The horizontal loop sutures and the double vertical loop sutures all failed by pulling out of the meniscus. The single vertical loop sutures failed by rupture of the suture itself. This study showed the superior mechanical characteristics of the single vertical loop suturing system over the other techniques tested. Owing to the more consistent failure strength, decreased costs, and shorter surgical time over the double vertical loop system, the single vertical loop technique is recommended for arthroscopic meniscal repair. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0749-8063 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90059-4 |