The case for collation to inform debate and transform practice in decolonising psychology

• Published in: South African journal of psychology Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 372 - 378
• Main Author: Macleod, Catriona Ida
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England Psychological Society of South Africa (PsySSA) 01-09-2018; SAGE Publications
• Subjects: Decolonising; Psychology; Relevance; South Africa; Systematic reviews; Textbooks; Decolonising; South Africa; systematic reviews; psychology; textbooks; relevance
• ISSN: 0081-2463; 2078-208X
• DOI: 10.1177/0081246318784508

Critiques of the ‘relevance’ of Psychology in South Africa and Africa have been raging for a number of decades now. Recent debates about decolonising Psychology and what is meant by African Psychology have been rigorous and necessary. In this commentary, I argue that in order for Psychology to move beyond Euro-American-centric epistemology and practice, these efforts need to be supplemented with the grounded praxis of research and literature collation. The epistemological, empirical, and conceptual knowledges that have been generated within the South African, African, and Global South contexts need to be brought together in coherent forms. As with other analytical processes, the grounded praxis of collating knowledges around a particular topic or approach allows for fresh insights and for the transfer of knowledges generated in context. Gaps in current research may be identified, debates on particular issues strengthened, and practice potentially improved. Drawing on two examples – textbooks and systematic literature reviews – and from my and colleagues’ work in conducting these kinds of collation work, I argue that: textbook writers should use grounded methodologies to generate texts based on South African, African, and Global South research, with reference to research conducted in the Global North being peripheral at best; and systematic reviews enable the cross-fertilisation of ideas from other social science research where psychological research is sparse. Funders should consider funding collation efforts.