Did the 2007 PCAOB Disciplinary Order against Deloitte Impose Actual Costs on the Firm or Improve Its Audit Quality?

• Published in: The Accounting review Vol. 90; no. 2; pp. 405 - 441
• Main Authors: Boone, Jeff P., Khurana, Inder K., Raman, K. K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sarasota American Accounting Association 01-03-2015
• Subjects: Auditing; Auditing standards; Audits; Big Four accounting firms; Censure; Costs; Customers; Fees; Fees & charges; Growth rates; Methodology; Regulatory agencies; Studies; United States > US
• ISSN: 0001-4826; 1558-7967
• DOI: 10.2308/accr-50867

We examine whether the December 2007 PCAOB disciplinary order against Deloitte affected Deloitte's switching risk, audit fees, and audit quality relative to the other Big 4 firms over a three-year period following the censure. Our findings suggest that the PCAOB censure was associated with a decrease in Deloitte's ability to retain clients and attract new clients, and a decrease in Deloitte's audit fee growth rates. However, methodologies used in extant archival studies yield little or no evidence to suggest that Deloitte's audit quality was different from that of the other Big 4 firms during a three-year window either before or after the censure. Overall, our results suggest that the PCAOB censure imposed actual costs on Deloitte.