Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

• Published in: F1000 research Vol. 8; p. 221
• Main Authors: Khamis, Assem M, Kahale, Lara A, Pardo-Hernandez, Hector, Schünemann, Holger J, Akl, Elie A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Faculty of 1000 Ltd 2019; F1000 Research Ltd
• Subjects: Libraries; Life cycles; Methods; Objectives; Research methodology; Reviews; Studies; Systematic review; Lebanon; Canada; Beirut Lebanon; Spain; living systematic review; study protocol; research methodology; research reporting
• ISSN: 2046-1402; 2046-1402
• DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.18005.1

Background: The living systematic review (LSR) is an emerging approach for improved evidence synthesis that uses continual updating to include relevant new evidence as soon as it is published. The objectives of this study are to: 1) assess the methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews using a living study approach; and 2) describe the life cycle of living systematic reviews, i.e., describe the changes over time to their methods and findings.
Methods: For objective 1, we will begin by conducting a cross-sectional survey and then update its findings every 6 months by including newly published LSRs. For objective 2, we will conduct a prospective longitudinal follow-up of the cohort of included LSRs. To identify LSRs, we will continually search the following electronic databases: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. We will also contact groups conducting LSRs to identify eligible studies that we might have missed. We will follow the standard systematic review methodology for study selection and data abstraction. For each LSR update, we will abstract information on the following: 1) general characteristics, 2) systematic review methodology, 3) living approach methodology, 4) results, and 5) editorial and publication processes. We will update the findings of both the surveys and the longitudinal follow-up of included LSRs every 6 months. In addition, we will identify articles addressing LSR methods to be included in an 'LSR methods repository'.
Conclusion: The proposed living methodological survey will allow us to monitor how the methods of conduct, and reporting as well as the findings of LSRs change over time. Ultimately this should help with ensuring the quality and transparency of LSRs.