Municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) dry weather flows and potential flow sources as assessed by conventional and advanced bacterial analyses

• Published in: Environmental pollution (1987) Vol. 337; p. 122521
• Main Authors: Li, Dong, Van De Werfhorst, Laurie C., Ervin, Jared, Poresky, Aaron, Steets, Brandon, Rivers, Cindy, Sharp, Grant, Smith, Jen, Holden, Patricia A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 15-11-2023
• Subjects: Bacterial community; MS4 outfall; Non-stormwater discharges; Potential human pathogen; Source tracking; Potential human pathogen; Source tracking; MS4 outfall; Non-stormwater discharges; Bacterial community
• ISSN: 0269-7491; 1873-6424
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122521

Municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) function in urbanized areas to convey flows during both wet weather (i.e., stormwater) and dry weather (i.e., urban runoff as well as subsurface sources of flow) to receiving waters. While urban stormwater is known to contain microbial and chemical pollutants, MS4 dry weather flows, or non-stormwater discharges (NSWDs), are much less studied, although they are also known to contain pollutants, especially when these flows include raw sewage. In addition, some natural NSWDs (e.g., from groundwater infiltrating MS4 pipes) are critical for aquatic habitat protection. Thus, it is important to distinguish NSWD sources to prevent non-natural flows while retaining natural waters (i.e., groundwater). Here, MS4 dry weather flows were assessed by analyzing water samples from MS4 outfalls across multiple watersheds and water provider service areas in south Orange County, CA; potential NSWD sources including sewage, recycled water, potable water, and groundwater were sampled and analyzed for their likely contributions to overall NSWDs. Geochemical and microbiological water quality indicators, as well as bacterial communities, differed across NSWDs, yet water quality within most locations did not vary significantly diurnally or by sampling date. Meanwhile, NSWD source waters had distinctly different bacterial taxa abundances and specific bacterial genera. Shared geochemical and microbial characteristics of certain sources and outfall flows suggested the contributions of sources to outfall flows. The average proportions by sources contributing to MS4 outfalls were further estimated by SourceTracker and FEAST, respectively. The results of this study highlight the use of multiple tools when assessing chemical and microbiological water quality to predict sources of NSWDs contributing to urban MS4 flows during dry weather. This information can be used to support management actions to reduce unnatural and high risk sources of dry weather drainage while preserving natural sources important to environmental health in downstream receiving waters.
[Display omitted]
•Significantly different water quality across MS4 outfalls and source waters.•Water quality differed across MS4 flows, but not within most locations.•Water quality parameters demonstrated the impacts of source waters on MS4 flows.•Specific bacterial genera associated with source waters.•Proportions predicted by sequencing and some water quality parameters correlated.