Teasing Apart Silvopasture System Components Using Machine Learning for Optimization

• Published in: Soil systems Vol. 5; no. 3; p. 41
• Main Authors: Kharel, Tulsi P., Ashworth, Amanda J., Owens, Phillip R., Philipp, Dirk, Thomas, Andrew L., Sauer, Thomas J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-09-2021
• Subjects: Algorithms; Artificial intelligence; Cadmium; Cattle; Chromium; classification and regression tree; Clustering; Feature selection; Forage; Grazing; hierarchical clustering; Landscape; Learning algorithms; Livestock; Livestock production; Machine learning; Metals; Moisture content; multiple linear regression; Optimization; Pasture; Plant production; Productivity; random forest; Regression analysis; silvopasture; Soil fertility; Soil nutrients; Soils; Statistical analysis; Topography; Variables; Variance analysis; Water flow
• ISSN: 2571-8789; 2571-8789
• DOI: 10.3390/soilsystems5030041

Silvopasture systems combine tree and livestock production to minimize market risk and enhance ecological services. Our objective was to explore and develop a method for identifying driving factors linked to productivity in a silvopastoral system using machine learning. A multi-variable approach was used to detect factors that affect system-level output (i.e., plant production (tree and forage), soil factors, and animal response based on grazing preference). Variables from a three-year (2017–2019) grazing study, including forage, tree, soil, and terrain attribute parameters, were analyzed. Hierarchical variable clustering and random forest model selected 10 important variables for each of four major clusters. A stepwise multiple linear regression and regression tree approach was used to predict cattle grazing hours per animal unit (h ha−1 AU−1) using 40 variables (10 per cluster) selected from 130 total variables. Overall, the variable ranking method selected more weighted variables for systems-level analysis. The regression tree performed better than stepwise linear regression for interpreting factor-level effects on animal grazing preference. Cattle were more likely to graze forage on soils with Cd levels <0.04 mg kg−1 (126% greater grazing hours per AU), soil Cr <0.098 mg kg−1 (108%), and a SAGA wetness index of <2.7 (57%). Cattle also preferred grazing (88%) native grasses compared to orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). The result shows water flow within the landscape position (wetness index), and associated metals distribution may be used as an indicator of animal grazing preference. Overall, soil nutrient distribution patterns drove grazing response, although animal grazing preference was also influenced by aboveground (forage and tree), soil, and landscape attributes. Machine learning approaches helped explain pasture use and overall drivers of grazing preference in a multifunctional system.