Endoscopic Intracorporal Abdominoplasty: A Review of 85 Cases

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) Vol. 102; no. 2; pp. 516 - 527
• Main Authors: Zukowski, Mark L, Ash, Keith, Spencer, David, Malanoski, Michael, Moore, Glen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hagerstown, MD American Society of Plastic Surgeons 01-08-1998; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
• Subjects: Abdomen; Abdominal Muscles - surgery; Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Fasciotomy; Female; Humans; Laparoscopes; Length of Stay; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Reoperation; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Surgery of the digestive system; Surgery, Plastic - instrumentation; Suture Techniques - instrumentation; Treatment Outcome; Human; Plasty; Endoscopic surgery; Treatment; Advantage; Indication; Surgery; Technique; Liposuction; Bibliographic review; Abdomen; Result
• ISSN: 0032-1052; 1529-4242
• DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199808000-00037

The specialty of plastic surgery has witnessed an explosion of novel procedures with the advent of endoscopy. Surgeons are making more aggressive attempts to reduce the length of scars and subsequent morbidity associated with traditional “open” procedures. Our purpose is to present a new technique of endoscopic abdominoplasty that has largely replaced traditional “full open” techniques at our institution. Since 1985, 85 patients have undergone a procedure that we call the endoscopic intracorporal abdominoplasty. This technique combines traditional abdominal wall liposuction with endoscopic intracorporal plication of the rectus fascia by using a series of horizontal mattress sutures. The procedure is performed using three 1-cm incisions and a series of midline and lateral skin nicks. These 85 patients were compared with 25 patients who underwent traditional open abdominoplasty with anterior plication of the rectus fascia. Average length of surgery was 127 minutes compared to 149 minutes with the open techniques. Length of hospitalization at our institution was 1 postoperative day compared to an average of 3 days with open techniques. No drains were used with the endoscopic techniques, and all of the open procedures had two drains placed. The perioperative rate of morbidity for the intracorporal abdominoplasty was 15 percent (13 of 85 patients) and with the open abdominoplasty cases it was 24 percent (6 of 25 patients). Our conclusion is that the endoscopic intracorporal abdominoplasty reduces operative scars and effectively plicates the rectus fascia, thereby reducing abdominal wall laxity. It has a rate of morbidity in a skilled laparoscopistʼs hands no greater than with traditional open abdominoplasty. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102516, 1998.)