Should “handled” prey be considered? Some consequences for functional response, predator–prey dynamics and optimal foraging theory

• Published in: Journal of theoretical biology Vol. 227; no. 2; pp. 167 - 174
• Main Authors: Krivan, Vlastimil, Vrkoc, Ivo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 21-03-2004
• Subjects: Animals; Feeding Behavior; Functional response; Interference; Models, Biological; Optimal foraging theory; Population Dynamics; Predatory Behavior; Predator–prey models; Optimal foraging theory; Functional response; Predator–prey models; Interference
• ISSN: 0022-5193; 1095-8541
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.10.013

Predator–prey models consider those prey that are free. They assume that once a prey is captured by a predator it leaves the system. A question arises whether in predator–prey population models the variable describing prey population shall consider only those prey which are free, or both free and handled prey together. In the latter case prey leave the system after they have been handled. The classical Holling type II functional response was derived with respect to free prey. In this article we derive a functional response with respect to prey density which considers also handled prey. This functional response depends on predator density, i.e., it accounts naturally for interference. We study consequences of this functional response for stability of a simple predator–prey model and for optimal foraging theory. We show that, qualitatively, the population dynamics are similar regardless of whether we consider only free or free and handled prey. However, the latter case may change predictions in some other cases. We document this for optimal foraging theory where the functional response which considers both free and handled prey leads to partial preferences which are not observed when only free prey are considered.