Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Pesticide Application in Soybean Crop

• Published in: AgriEngineering Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 2049 - 2063
• Main Authors: Lopes, Luana de Lima, Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da, Nomelini, Quintiliano Siqueira Schroden
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-12-2023
• Subjects: aerial spraying; Agricultural commodities; Agricultural production; Control methods; Crop dusting; Crops; Deposition; drone; Environmental conditions; Experiments; Food; Glycine max (L.) Merrill; Nozzles; Pesticide application; Pesticides; Process control; Quality standards; remotely piloted aircraft; Soybeans; Spectrophotometry; spray deposition; Spray nozzles; Sprays; Statistical process control; Statistics; Technical information; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Brazil; United States > US
• ISSN: 2624-7402; 2624-7402
• DOI: 10.3390/agriengineering5040126

The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for pesticide application has increased substantially. However, there is a lack of technical information regarding the optimal operational parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of pesticide application on a soybean crop using a UAV employing different spray nozzles. The experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design with four treatments and eight repetitions. The trial was conducted in a soybean growing area during the soybean reproductive stage (1.1 m tall). The treatments included aerial application (rate: 10 L hm−2) using an Agras MG1-P UAV with XR 11001 (flat fan), AirMix 11001 (air-induction flat fan), and COAP 9001 (hollow cone spray) nozzles; for comparison, ground application (rate of 100 L hm−2) using a constant pressure knapsack sprayer with an XR 110015 (flat fan) nozzle was performed. The deposition was evaluated by quantifying a tracer (brilliant blue) using spectrophotometry and analyzing the droplet spectrum using water-sensitive paper. Furthermore, the application quality was investigated using statistical process control methodology. The best deposition performance was exhibited by the application via UAV using the COAP 9001 and AirMix 11001 nozzles. For all the treatments, the process remained under statistical control, indicating commendable adherence to quality standards. The aerial application provided greater penetration of the spray into the crop canopy. With the use of the UAV, the coverage on the water-sensitive paper was <1%; moreover, the AirMix 11001 and XR 110015 nozzles had the lowest drift potential.