Examination of Provider and Patient Knowledge, Beliefs, and Preferences in Integrative Oncology at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center

• Published in: Integrative medicine reports Vol. 1; no. 1; pp. 66 - 75
• Main Authors: Mascaro, Jennifer S, Catic, Almira, Srivastava, Meha, Diller, Maggie, Rana, Shaheen, Escoffery, Cam, Master, Viraj
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 01-06-2022; Mary Ann Liebert
• Subjects: barriers; comprehensive cancer center; facilitators; implementation science; integrative oncology; survivorship; comprehensive cancer center; survivorship; barriers; facilitators; integrative oncology; implementation science
• ISSN: 2768-3222; 2768-3222
• DOI: 10.1089/imr.2021.0004

The use of integrative approaches for symptom management is highly prevalent among patients undergoing cancer treatment and among cancer survivors and is increasingly endorsed by clinical practice guidelines. However, access to and implementation of integrative oncology (IO) approaches are hindered by barriers at multiple levels, including logistic, geographic, financial, organizational, and cultural barriers. The goal of this mixed-method study was to examine oncology provider and patient knowledge, beliefs, and preferences in IO to identify facilitators, barriers, and recommendations for implementation of IO modalities.
Data sources included patient surveys and provider semistructured interviews. Patients were in active treatment (
 = 100) and survivors (
 = 100) of heterogeneous cancer types. Patient and survivor surveys interrogated: (1) interest in types of IO approaches; and (2) preferences for delivery modality, frequency, and location. Providers (
 = 18) were oncologists and nurse navigators working with diverse cancer types. Interviews queried their knowledge of and attitudes about IO, about their patients' needs for symptom management, and for recommendations for implementation of IO approaches in their clinic. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to systematically analyze provider interviews.
The primary interests reported among actively treated patients and survivors were massage therapy, acupuncture, and wellness/exercise. Most patients expressed interest in both group and individual sessions and in telehealth or virtual reality options. Emergent themes from provider interviews identified barriers and facilitators to implementing IO approaches in both the internal and external settings, as well as for the implementation process.
The emphasis on mind-body interventions as
rather than
highlights the importance of interventions as evidence-based, comprehensive, and integrated into health care. Gaining simultaneous perspectives from both patients and physicians generated insights for the implementation of IO care into complex clinical systems within a comprehensive cancer center.