Comparative α-Helicity of Cyclic Pentapeptides in Water

Helix‐constrained polypeptides have attracted great interest for modulating protein–protein interactions (PPI). It is not known which are the most effective helix‐inducing strategies for designing PPI agonists/antagonists. Cyclization linkers (X1–X5) were compared here, using circular dichroism and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Angewandte Chemie International Edition Vol. 53; no. 27; pp. 6965 - 6969
Main Authors: de Araujo, Aline D., Hoang, Huy N., Kok, W. Mei, Diness, Frederik, Gupta, Praveer, Hill, Timothy A., Driver, Russell W., Price, David A., Liras, Spiros, Fairlie, David P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Weinheim WILEY-VCH Verlag 01-07-2014
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Helix‐constrained polypeptides have attracted great interest for modulating protein–protein interactions (PPI). It is not known which are the most effective helix‐inducing strategies for designing PPI agonists/antagonists. Cyclization linkers (X1–X5) were compared here, using circular dichroism and 2D NMR spectroscopy, for α‐helix induction in simple model pentapeptides, Ac‐cyclo(1,5)‐[X1‐Ala‐Ala‐Ala‐X5]‐NH2, in water. In this very stringent test of helix induction, a Lys1→Asp5 lactam linker conferred greatest α‐helicity, hydrocarbon and triazole linkers induced a mix of α‐ and 310‐helicity, while thio‐ and dithioether linkers produced less helicity. The lactam‐linked cyclic pentapeptide was also the most effective α‐helix nucleator attached to a 13‐residue model peptide. Covalent linkers between amino acid side chains in peptide sequences can induce bioactive α‐helical conformations that modulate protein–protein interactions. A specific lactam linker is shown here to confer more α‐helicity than other cross‐links to a cyclic pentapeptide in water, and to be a better helix nucleator when attached to longer peptides.
Bibliography:We acknowledge ARC for a Federation Fellowship to D.F. (FF0668733), grants (DP1096290, DP130100629, LP110200213), and the Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging (CE140100011); NHMRC for a Senior Principal Research Fellowship to D.F. (APP1027369) and a grant (APP511194); the Queensland Government for a CIF grant, and the Carlsberg Foundation (Denmark) for a postdoctoral fellowship to F.D.
istex:09AC65F067BDA52DFF5710537A14DFE554E21502
ark:/67375/WNG-0061QNND-D
ArticleID:ANIE201310245
These authors contributed equally to this work.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1433-7851
1521-3773
DOI:10.1002/anie.201310245