Causes for the Century-Long Decline in Colorado River Flow

• Published in: Journal of climate Vol. 32; no. 23; pp. 8181 - 8203
• Main Authors: Hoerling, M., Barsugli, J., Livneh, B., Eischeid, J., Quan, X., Badger, A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston American Meteorological Society 01-12-2019
• Subjects: Climate change; Climate models; Container ports; Elasticity; Environmental science; Experiments; Ferries; General circulation models; Hydrology; Hypotheses; Laboratories; Natural variability; Physical sciences; Precipitation; Rain; River basins; River flow; Rivers; Stream discharge; Stream flow; Surface temperature; Temperature effects; Trends; United States > US; Colorado; Colorado River
• ISSN: 0894-8755; 1520-0442
• DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0207.1

Upper Colorado River basin streamflow has declined by roughly 20% over the last century of the instrumental period, based on estimates of naturalized flow above Lees Ferry. Here we assess factors causing the decline and evaluate the premise that rising surface temperatures have been mostly responsible. We use an event attribution framework involving parallel sets of global model experiments with and without climate change drivers. We demonstrate that climate change forcing has acted to reduce Upper Colorado River basin streamflow during this period by about 10% (with uncertainty range of 6%–14% reductions). The magnitude of the observed flow decline is found to be inconsistent with natural variability alone, and approximately one-half of the observed flow decline is judged to have resulted from long-term climate change. Each of three different global models used herein indicates that climate change forcing during the last century has acted to increase surface temperature (∼+1.2°C) and decrease precipitation (∼−3%). Using large ensemble methods, we diagnose the separate effects of temperature and precipitation changes on Upper Colorado River streamflow. Precipitation change is found to be the most consequential factor owing to its amplified impact on flow resulting from precipitation elasticity (percent change in streamflow per percent change in precipitation) of ∼2. We confirm that warming has also driven streamflow declines, as inferred from empirical studies, although operating as a secondary factor. Our finding of a modest −2.5% °C−1 temperature sensitivity, on the basis of our best model-derived estimate, indicates that only about one-third of the attributable climate change signal in Colorado River decline resulted from warming, whereas about two-thirds resulted from precipitation decline.