Telemedicine Is an Effective Tool to Monitor Disease Activity in IBD Patients in the COVID-19 Era: A Single Centre Experience Based on Objective Data

• Published in: Gastroenterology insights Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 117 - 126
• Main Authors: Sinagra, Emanuele, Busacca, Anita, Guida, Laura, Carrozza, Lucio, Brinch, Daniele, Crispino, Federica, Maida, Marcello, Battaglia, Salvatore, Celsa, Ciro, Cammà, Calogero, Cappello, Maria
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston MDPI AG 01-03-2022
• Subjects: Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Crohn’s Disease; Emergency medical care; Inflammatory bowel disease; Telemedicine; ulcerative colitis; United States > US
• ISSN: 2036-7422; 2036-7414; 2036-7422
• DOI: 10.3390/gastroent13010013

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak has led IBD clinics to adopt a remote monitoring approach in order to guarantee an adequate follow-up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and ensure the rules of social distancing. Aim: The aim of the study was to perform a survey on IBD patients who underwent remote monitoring in our tertiary referral center, to assess adherence, patients’ perceptions and satisfaction, and finally their opinions for future monitoring. Furthermore, we evaluated changes in disease activity and Quality of Life (QoL) using validated questionnaires. Methods: Consecutive patients with IBD scheduled for follow-up visits were switched to remote monitoring through e-mail from March 2020 to February 2021. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire focusing on the following elements of the intervention: (1) self-assessment questions, (2) action plans, and (3) educational messages. Results: Four hundred and twenty four Caucasian patients completed the survey. 233 (55.1%) were male, 220 (52.0%) had Crohn’s Disease (CD). Median baseline Mayo Score and Harvey Bradshaw Index were 3 and 4, respectively. 9 (2.1%) patients were referred to the emergency department because of disease flares. 410 (96.9%) patients were satisfied with telemedicine, and 320 (76.5%) patients reported that they would maintain this approach also after COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, on univariate logistic regression analysis, none of the variables were related to patients’ satisfaction or to an improved QoL. The presence of ulcerative colitis was associated with the need for treatment change. Conclusions: Our results suggest that a telemedicine approach is well accepted by patients with IBD and could represent an effective tool in monitoring disease activity. Further controlled studies are warranted to properly assess if telemedicine can replace face-to-face consultations in IBD.