The uniqueness of the human brain: a review

The purpose of this review is to highlight the most important aspects of the anatomical and functional uniqueness of the human brain. For this, a comparison is made between our brains and those of our closest ancestors (chimpanzees and bonobos) and human ancestors. During human evolution, several ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dementia & neuropsychologia Vol. 18; p. e20230078
Main Author: Pittella, José Eymard Homem
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Brazil Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento 2024
Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this review is to highlight the most important aspects of the anatomical and functional uniqueness of the human brain. For this, a comparison is made between our brains and those of our closest ancestors (chimpanzees and bonobos) and human ancestors. During human evolution, several changes occurred in the brain, such as an absolute increase in brain size and number of cortical neurons, in addition to a greater degree of functional lateralization and anatomical asymmetry. Also, the cortical cytoarchitecture became more diversified and there was an increase in the number of intracortical networks and networks extending from the cerebral cortex to subcortical structures, with more neural networks being invested in multisensory and sensory-motor-affective-cognitive integration. These changes permitted more complex, flexible and versatile cognitive abilities and social behavior, such as shared intentionality and symbolic articulated language, which, in turn, made possible the formation of larger social groups and cumulative cultural evolution that are characteristic of our species.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
ISSN:1980-5764
1980-5764
2764-4863
DOI:10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0078