Abdominal content containment: practicalities and outcome

Background: Alternatives to fascial closure of the abdominal wall are increasingly used in critically ill patients. They pose practical and logistical problems in management which are described in this single‐institution study. Methods: Between January 1994 and December 1997, 157 predominantly young...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of surgery Vol. 87; no. 1; pp. 106 - 109
Main Authors: Ghimenton, F., Thomson, S. R., Muckart, D. J. J., Burrows, R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01-01-2000
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Alternatives to fascial closure of the abdominal wall are increasingly used in critically ill patients. They pose practical and logistical problems in management which are described in this single‐institution study. Methods: Between January 1994 and December 1997, 157 predominantly young male patients (100 trauma and 57 non‐trauma) underwent temporary abdominal content containment (t‐ACC) using plastic bags or polyglactin mesh. Indications for t‐ACC were severe sepsis requiring reoperation, abdominal compartment syndrome, abdominal wall tissue loss or a combination of these. A total of 385 laparotomies were performed. Results: Two t‐ACC procedures failed owing to technical error and two were complicated by enteric fistulas. Six patients underwent early definitive abdominal closure within 15 days. The remaining survivors had a protracted hospital stay (mean(s.d.) 44·6(26·6) days) and all developed incisional hernias which were challenging to repair. The overall mortality rate was 44 per cent. Conclusion: Plastic bags were cheaper and as effective as polyglactin mesh for t‐ACC. Survivors require a multidisciplinary approach in management, undergo a protracted hospital stay and later need complex incisional hernia repairs. © 2000 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd
Bibliography:istex:5DCDCCAD6912C36FB84FCCDD593C980D9F0539AE
ArticleID:BJS655
ark:/67375/WNG-1S83LFJP-1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01337.x