Routine quantitative analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces with MR imaging

A computerized system for processing spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data was implemented to estimate whole brain (gray and white matter) and cerebrospinal fluid volumes and to display three-dimensional surface reconstructions of specified tissue classes. The techniques were evaluated by a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 2; no. 6; p. 619
Main Authors: Kikinis, R, Shenton, M E, Gerig, G, Martin, J, Anderson, M, Metcalf, D, Guttmann, C R, McCarley, R W, Lorensen, W, Cline, H
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01-11-1992
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A computerized system for processing spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data was implemented to estimate whole brain (gray and white matter) and cerebrospinal fluid volumes and to display three-dimensional surface reconstructions of specified tissue classes. The techniques were evaluated by assessing the radiometric variability of MR volume data and by comparing automated and manual procedures for measuring tissue volumes. Results showed (a) the homogeneity of the MR data and (b) that automated techniques were consistently superior to manual techniques. Both techniques, however, were affected by the complexity of the structure, with simpler structures (eg, the intracranial cavity) showing less variability and better spatial correlation of segmentation results between raters. Moreover, the automated techniques were completed for whole brain in a fraction of the time required to complete the equivalent segmentation manually. Additional evaluations included interrater reliability and an evaluation that included longitudinal measurement, in which one subject was imaged sequentially 24 times, with reliability computed from data collected by three raters over 1 year. Results showed good reliability for the automated segmentation procedures.
ISSN:1053-1807
DOI:10.1002/jmri.1880020603