Five methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori in the Turkish population

AIM: To compare culture analysis, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) stool antigen (HpSA) test, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for H. pylori detection. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two consecutive adult dyspeptic patients receiving diagnostic endoscopy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 17; no. 47; pp. 5172 - 5176
Main Authors: Aktepe, Orhan Cem, Ciftçi, Ihsan Hakkı, Safak, Birol, Uslan, Ihsan, Dilek, Fatma Hüsniye
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited 21-12-2011
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AIM: To compare culture analysis, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) stool antigen (HpSA) test, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for H. pylori detection. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two consecutive adult dyspeptic patients receiving diagnostic endoscopy at the department of gastroenterology were enrolled in this study. Culture and histological examination were performed on biopsy specimens. PCR and FISH tests were applied to histopathological samples. Stool samples that were simultaneously collected were tested for the H. pylori antigen using the HpSA test and bacterial DNA using stool PCR. RESULTS: H. pylori was positively identified by histo-logical examination in 85/132 (64.4%) of the patients, while positive samples were found in 56 (42.4%), 64 (48.5%), 98 (74.2%), 28 (21.2%) and 81 (61.4%) of the patients by culture, HpSA, PCR, stool PCR and FISH methods, respectively. The results of the culture, biopsy PCR, HpSA and FISH tests, with the exception of the stool PCR, were found to correlate with the histological examination as a gold standard. CONCLUSION: The HpSA test is a rapid, simple, and noninvasive test for monitoring therapy. FISH is an accurate, rapid, cost-effective, and easy-to-use test for H. pylori detection.
Bibliography:Helicobacter pylori; Histology; Polymerasechain reaction; Helicobacter pylori stool antigen; Fluo-rescence in situ hybridization
14-1219/R
AIM: To compare culture analysis, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) stool antigen (HpSA) test, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for H. pylori detection. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two consecutive adult dyspeptic patients receiving diagnostic endoscopy at the department of gastroenterology were enrolled in this study. Culture and histological examination were performed on biopsy specimens. PCR and FISH tests were applied to histopathological samples. Stool samples that were simultaneously collected were tested for the H. pylori antigen using the HpSA test and bacterial DNA using stool PCR. RESULTS: H. pylori was positively identified by histo-logical examination in 85/132 (64.4%) of the patients, while positive samples were found in 56 (42.4%), 64 (48.5%), 98 (74.2%), 28 (21.2%) and 81 (61.4%) of the patients by culture, HpSA, PCR, stool PCR and FISH methods, respectively. The results of the culture, biopsy PCR, HpSA and FISH tests, with the exception of the stool PCR, were found to correlate with the histological examination as a gold standard. CONCLUSION: The HpSA test is a rapid, simple, and noninvasive test for monitoring therapy. FISH is an accurate, rapid, cost-effective, and easy-to-use test for H. pylori detection.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Correspondence to: Orhan Cem Aktepe, Associated Professor, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Ali Çetinkaya Campus, 03200 Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. aktepef@hotmail.com
Author contributions: Aktepe OC, Çiftçi İH and Dilek FH designed the research; Aktepe OC, Çiftçi İH, Şafak B and Uslan İ performed the research; Aktepe OC contributed to new analytic tools; Çiftçi İH and Dilek FH analyzed the data; and Aktepe OC and Çiftçi İH wrote the paper.
Telephone: +90-272-2463304 Fax: +90-272-2463300
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v17.i47.5172