Intercomparison of Ocean Color Algorithms for Picophytoplankton Carbon in the Ocean
The differences among phytoplankton carbon ($C_{phy}$) predictions from six ocean colour algorithms are investigated by comparison with \textit{in situ} estimates of phytoplankton carbon. The common satellite data used as input for the algorithms is the Ocean Colour Climate Change Initiative merged...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in Marine Science Vol. 4 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lausanne
Frontiers Research Foundation
11-12-2017
Frontiers Media S.A |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The differences among phytoplankton carbon ($C_{phy}$) predictions from six ocean colour algorithms are investigated by comparison with \textit{in situ} estimates of phytoplankton carbon. The common satellite data used as input for the algorithms is the Ocean Colour Climate Change Initiative merged product. The matching \textit{in situ} data are derived from flow cytometric cell counts and per-cell carbon estimates for different types of pico-phytoplankton. This combination of satellite and \textit{in situ} data provides a relatively large matching dataset (N$>$500), which is independent from most of the algorithms tested and spans almost two orders of magnitude in $C_{phy}$. Results show that not a single algorithm outperforms any of the other when using all matching data. Concentrating on the oligotrophic regions ($B$ \textless 0.15 mg\,Chl\,m$^{-3}$), where flow cytometric analysis captures most of the phytoplankton biomass, reveals significant differences in algorithm performance. The bias ranges from -35\% to +150\% and RMSD (unbiased) from 5 to 10 mg\,C\,m$^{-3}$ among algorithms, with chlorophyll-based algorithms performing better than the rest. The backscattering-based algorithms produce different reasults at the clearest waters and these differences are discussed in terms of the different algorithms used for $b_{bp}$ retrieval. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2296-7745 2296-7745 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fmars.2017.00378 |