Soil and plant response to three subsoiling implements

• Published in: Soil Science Society of America journal Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 804 - 808
• Main Authors: Busscher, W.J, Karlen, D.L, Sojka, R.E, Burnham, K.P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Madison, WI Soil Science Society of America 01-05-1988
• Subjects: Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Biological and medical sciences; COMPACTACION DEL SUELO; COMPACTAGE DU SOL; Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage; CULTIVO; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General agronomy. Plant production; Generalities; LABRANZA; Physical properties; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils; PRATIQUE CULTURALE; PROPIEDADES FISICO-QUIMICAS (SUELO); PROPRIETE PHYSICO-CHIMIQUE DU SOL; RESISTANCE MECANIQUE; RESISTENCIA (MECANICA); Soil science; Structure, texture, density, mechanical behavior. Heat and gas exchanges; Tillage. Tending. Growth control; TRAVAIL DU SOL; ZEA MAYS; Monocotyledones; Gramineae; Angiospermae; Subsoiling; Spermatophyta; Compaction; Loamy sand soil; Strength
• ISSN: 0361-5995; 1435-0661
• DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200030037x

Many Southeastern Coastal Plain soils require deep (greater than 0.45 m) inrow tillage or subsoiling to disrupt dense tillage/traffic pans an/or eluvial (E) horizons. Three subsoiling implements [Super Seeder (SS), ParaTill (PT), and Kelly (KE)] were compared on Norfolk (Typic Paleudult) loamy sand to assess their effectiveness in developing and maintaining a proper rooting environment for corn (Zea mays L.). Soil strength (cone index) for the implements was evaluated with and without conventional surface tillage (disking). All three subsoiling implements effectively disrupted the E horizon regardless of surface tillage, but the 67% stand establishment in nondisked treatments was significantly lower than for disked treatments (92%). However, yields were not significantly different. Significant differences in soil strength were measured among subsoiling implements at the beginning of each growing season. In 1985 mean profile soil strength was lower (P less than or equal to 0.10) for SS and PT than for KE. In 1986, soil strength was lower (P less than or equal to 0.10) for SS than either PT or KE. The consistent difference between SS and KE occurred because SS disrupted a larger area than the thinner-skanked KE. Nondisked treatments had mean soil strength that was 0.32 MPa lower within the row than disked treatments, but disked treatments had mean soil strength that was 0.37 MPa lower between the rows. Soil strength results suggest that Coastal Plain soils, which have been subsoiled, are likely to restrict root development regardless of implement with, or without, prior surface tillage