Charging Chinese future: the roadmap of China's policy for new energy automotive industry

China's new energy vehicle (NEV) industry, which survives with powerful policy intervention and fostering, is an important branch of Chinese green energy policy revolution against climate change and circumstance issues. In the study, the roadmap of China's policy exploration on developing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of hydrogen energy Vol. 45; no. 20; pp. 11409 - 11423
Main Author: Li, Jianzhong
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 14-04-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:China's new energy vehicle (NEV) industry, which survives with powerful policy intervention and fostering, is an important branch of Chinese green energy policy revolution against climate change and circumstance issues. In the study, the roadmap of China's policy exploration on developing China's NEV industry within the time window of 2001–2020 was investigated systematically. Powerful policy intervention plays an important role in initializing the framework of China's NEV industry under the comprehensive situation when China's innovation capability and automobile technology were both at unsatisfactory state. China's policy of developing NEV market demonstrates that intense government intervention is necessary and successful at the starting stage of the NEV industry. Delicate balance between governmental intervention and market self-adjustment should be intensified by suitable policies. The pilot innovations and the serious lessons of China's policy explorations are of both practical and research significance for other developing countries. •China's policy development of new energy vehicle industry is schemed thoroughly.•Intense government intervention is necessary and successful at the starting stage.•China's new energy vehicle industry is a government-centralized dance.•Delicate balance between policy intervention and market-adjustment should be kept.
ISSN:0360-3199
1879-3487
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.075