Mapping and assessing indicator-based frameworks for monitoring circular economy development at the city-level

• Published in: Sustainable cities and society Vol. 75; p. 103378
• Main Authors: Papageorgiou, Asterios, Henrysson, Maryna, Nuur, Cali, Sinha, Rajib, Sundberg, Cecilia, Vanhuyse, Fedra
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-12-2021
• Subjects: Circular cities; Circularity; Indicators; Metrics; Monitoring and evaluation; Sustainable urban development; Circular cities; Sustainable urban development; Metrics; Monitoring and evaluation; indicators; Circularity
• ISSN: 2210-6707; 2210-6715
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103378

•Assessment of indicator-based frameworks applicable to measure urban circularity.•Definition of criteria and validity requirements for assessing the frameworks.•The extent of compliance with the criteria differs among the frameworks.•None of the frameworks fulfills all the validity requirements.•Most frameworks consist mainly of indicators reflecting environmental aspects.
The transition towards a circular economy (CE) is increasingly recognized as a promising pathway to tackle pressing sustainability challenges at the city-level. Indicator-based frameworks, that is, integrated systems of indicators, are considered as useful tools for monitoring this transition. Yet, studies that map and assess such frameworks are scanty. This article addresses this gap by assessing 15 indicator-based frameworks applicable to measure circularity at the city-level. The identified frameworks were assessed using eight criteria (transparency, stakeholder engagement, effective communication, ability to track temporal changes, applicability, alignment with CE principles, validity and relevance to sustainable development). Additionally, 12 validity requirements were defined to assess to what extent the indicators in the frameworks reflect CE aspects. The assessment reveals a wide variation regarding the extent to which the frameworks match the criteria with none of them satisfying all. In addition, in terms of validity criterion, none includes indicators that fulfill all the validity requirements. Furthermore, most frameworks consist mainly of environmental indicators and only three include indicators reflecting aspects related to the four pillars of sustainable development (environmental, social, economic and governance). Further research could develop a standardized framework for measuring circularity at the city-level and improving existing frameworks.