Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee communities via flower resources

• Published in: The Journal of applied ecology Vol. 55; no. 4; pp. 1714 - 1724
• Main Authors: Marja, Riho, Viik, Eneli, Mänd, Marika, Phillips, James, Klein, Alexandra-Maria, Batáry, Péter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford John Wiley & Sons Ltd 01-07-2018; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Agricultural land; Agricultural policy; Agricultural practices; Biodiversity; Bombus; Bumblebees; concentration effect; Crop rotation; Crops; Dilution; dilution effect; Environmental impact; Environmental management; Environmental policy; Farm management; Farming; Flowering; functional traits; land use; Landscape; mass‐flowering crops; Organic farming; organic management; pollinator; Pollinators; Pollinators and pollination services; Rollover; Species diversity; Species richness; Sustainable agriculture; Threatened species
• ISSN: 0021-8901; 1365-2664
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13119

1. In many parts of the world, farmland pollinators decreased significantly during the last half of the 20th century mainly due to land-use changes and agricultural intensification. 2. We studied the effect of different typical crop rotations and agri-environment schemes (AES) on bumblebee diversity in Estonia. We compared species abundances between four crop rotation types (cereal rollover [no change from 1 year to the next], cereal to mass-flowering crops [hereafter MFC], MFC rollover and MFC to cereal fields) where all counts were conducted in the second year and in three farming types (conventional farming, organic farming and environmentally friendly management). 3. We surveyed bumblebees and flower cover along 401 field margins in five con-secutive years and recorded 20 species and more than 6,000 individuals. Abundances of long-tongued and threatened bumblebee species were higher at the field margins of cereal rollover fields than for the other three crop rotation types. In addition, cereal rollover field margins had higher abundances of medium colony species, generalists and forest-scrub species than MFC rollover and MFC to cereal or cereal to MFC field margins. Bumblebee species richness was higher at the field margins of both AES types than those of conventional farming. However, in general, the strongest driver of bumblebee presence was flower cover. 4. Higher bumblebee abundances in cereal rollover field margins were probably owing to a concentration effect there and/or a dilution effect into MFC fields. Both AES schemes supported increasing flower cover in field margins and thereby diversity of bumblebees, indicating positive AES impacts upon wild pollinators. 5. Synthesis and applications. Crop rotation and agri-environment schemes determine bumblebee richness and abundance via the availability of flower resources, but crop rotation constrains bumblebees differently based on their traits. Therefore, future agri-environmental policy should account for these management options. Crop rotation could be a simple, but efficient solution to increase the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes.