Minimizing complications from nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: Cost‐effectiveness of competing strategies in varying risk groups
Objective To appraise the cost‐effectiveness of competing therapeutic strategies in patient cohorts eligible for aspirin prophylaxis with varying degrees of gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular risk. Methods Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility analyses were performed to evaluate 3 competing stra...
Saved in:
Published in: | Arthritis and rheumatism Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 185 - 197 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
15-04-2005
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
To appraise the cost‐effectiveness of competing therapeutic strategies in patient cohorts eligible for aspirin prophylaxis with varying degrees of gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular risk.
Methods
Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility analyses were performed to evaluate 3 competing strategies for the management of chronic arthritis: 1) a generic nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAIDNS) alone; 2) NSAIDNS plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI); and 3) a cyclooxygenase 2‐selective inhibitor (coxib) alone. Cost estimates were from a third‐party payer perspective. The outcomes were incremental cost per ulcer complication avoided and incremental cost per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of varying patient GI risks and aspirin use.
Results
In average‐risk patients, the NSAIDNS + PPI strategy costs an incremental $45,350 per additional ulcer complication avoided and $309,666 per QALY gained compared with the NSAIDNS strategy. The coxib strategy was less effective and more expensive than the NSAIDNS + PPI strategy. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the NSAIDNS + PPI strategy became the dominant approach in patients at high risk for an NSAID adverse event (i.e., patients taking aspirin with ≥1 risk factor for a GI complication).
Conclusion
Generic nonselective NSAIDs are most cost‐effective in patients at low risk for an adverse event. However, the addition of a PPI to a nonselective NSAID may be the preferred strategy in patients taking aspirin or otherwise at high risk for a GI or cardiovascular adverse event. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-3591 0893-7524 1529-0131 1529-0123 |
DOI: | 10.1002/art.21065 |