Asymmetric effect of environmental cost of forest rents in the Guinean forest-savanna mosaic: The Nigerian experience

• Published in: Environmental science and pollution research international Vol. 30; no. 17; pp. 50549 - 50566
• Main Authors: Usman, Ojonugwa, Alola, Andrew Adewale, Usman, Monday, Uzuner, Gizem
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-04-2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Agricultural economics; Aquatic Pollution; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution; Autoregressive models; Carbon dioxide; Carbon Dioxide - analysis; Carbon dioxide emissions; Clean energy; Crop production; Deforestation; Earth and Environmental Science; Economic Development; Economic growth; Economics; Ecotoxicology; Emissions; Energy consumption; Energy policy; Energy-Generating Resources; Environment; Environmental Chemistry; Environmental degradation; Environmental effects; Environmental Health; Environmental impact; Environmental science; Environmental testing; Forests; Fossil fuels; Grassland; Papua New Guinea; Research Article; Savannahs; Shock; Waste Water Technology; Water Management; Water Pollution Control; Papua New Guinea; Nigeria; Deforestation; Forest rents; Fossil fuel energy; Nigeria; Guinean Forest-savanna Mosaic; Agricultural production
• ISSN: 1614-7499; 0944-1344; 1614-7499
• DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-25653-x

Several studies have identified deforestation as a major cause of environmental degradation, but little is known about the asymmetric effect of the environmental cost of forest rents. To fill this gap, our study uses the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model and asymmetric causality test to examine the environmental implication of forest rents in the Guinean Forest-Savanna Mosaic of Nigeria over the period 1990:Q1 to 2016:Q4. The empirical results show that forest rents increase CO
2
emissions when the shock to forest rents is positive and decreases CO
2
emissions when the shock to forest rents is negative. The results further show evidence of asymmetric effects of crop production, fossil fuel energy consumption, and economic growth on CO
2
emissions. Moreover, the effects of both positive and negative shocks in economic growth are elastic, suggesting that CO
2
emissions respond in a larger magnitude to a 1% positive or negative shock in economic growth. While the positive shock to crop production and economic growth stimulates CO
2
emissions, their negative shocks dampen CO
2
emissions. In addition, the positive (negative) shocks to fossil energy consumption exert upward (downward) pressure on CO
2
emissions. Furthermore, the asymmetric causality test divulges that a positive change in forest rents causes a negative change in CO
2
emissions and a negative change in forest rents causes a positive change in CO
2
emissions. Based on these findings, the study recommends the need for policymakers to formulate sound policies to protect the forests and transit toward clean energy consumption to minimize energy-related CO
2
emissions in the country.