Defining and predicting radiographic knee osteoarthritis progression: a systematic review of findings from the osteoarthritis initiative

Purpose The purposes of this systematic review were to (1) identify the commonly used definitions of radiographic KOA progression, (2) summarize the important associative risk factors for disease progression based on findings from the OAI study and (3) summarize findings from radiographic KOA progre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA Vol. 30; no. 12; pp. 4015 - 4028
Main Authors: Joo, Peter Y., Borjali, Alireza, Chen, Antonia F., Muratoglu, Orhun K., Varadarajan, Kartik M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-12-2022
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The purposes of this systematic review were to (1) identify the commonly used definitions of radiographic KOA progression, (2) summarize the important associative risk factors for disease progression based on findings from the OAI study and (3) summarize findings from radiographic KOA progression prediction modeling studies regarding the characterization of progression and outcomes. Methods A systematic review was performed by conducting a literature search of definitions, risk factors and predictive models for radiographic KOA progression that utilized data from the OAI database. Radiographic progression was further characterized into “accelerated KOA” and “typical progression,” as defined by included studies. Results Of 314 studies identified, 41 studies were included in the present review. Twenty-eight (28) studies analyzed risk factors associated with KOA progression, and 13 studies created or validated prediction models or risk calculators for progression. Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade based on radiographs was most commonly used to characterize KOA progression (50%), followed by joint space width (JSW) narrowing (32%) generally over 48 months. Risk factors with the highest odds ratios (OR) for progression included periarticular bone mineral density (OR 10.40), any knee injury within 1 year (OR 9.22) and baseline bone mineral lesions (OR 7.92). Nine prediction modeling studies utilized both clinical and structural risk factors to inform their models, and combined models outperformed purely clinical or structural models. Conclusion The cumulative evidence suggests that combinations of structural and clinical risk factors may be able to predict radiographic KOA progression, particularly in patients with accelerated progression. Clinically relevant and feasible prediction models and risk calculators may provide valuable decision-making support when caring for patients at risk of KOA progression, although standardization in modeling and variable identification does not yet exist.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0942-2056
1433-7347
DOI:10.1007/s00167-021-06768-5