Radiation dose reduction in the setting of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: the value of optimized fluoroscopy settings and intracardiac echocardiography
Cryoballoon (CB) has proven to be very effective in the percutaneous treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). CB ablation is still hampered by X-ray exposure and the doses applied are consistently higher if compared to radiofrequency ablation. All patients who underwent CB ablation between 2015 and 20...
Saved in:
Published in: | The international journal of cardiovascular imaging Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 245 - 254 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
01-01-2023
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Cryoballoon (CB) has proven to be very effective in the percutaneous treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). CB ablation is still hampered by X-ray exposure and the doses applied are consistently higher if compared to radiofrequency ablation. All patients who underwent CB ablation between 2015 and 2020 were analysed. Intracardiac echography was consistently used for transeptal puncture. To demonstrate the differences in radiation exposure 3 groups of 50 consecutive patients were selected. In the first group (G1) 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) was used as an intraprocedural imaging method. In the second group (G2), traditional X-ray imaging was used and frame rates both for fluoro and cine modes of diascopy were lowered. In the third group (G3) only 2–3 frames per second were used, cine mode was abandoned and the grid was removed from the X-ray detector. A total of 150 patients were included (76% males, mean age 57.3 ± 11.5 years). A dramatic reduction of radiation dose was obtained from 9585 ± 5610 µGy/m
2
in G1 to 2469 ± 2002 µGy/m
2
in G2 and finally 227.1 ± 360 µGy/m
2
in G3 (p < 0.0001). There was also a significant decrease of procedural and fluoroscopy times. No difference in major complications and midterm outcomes was found between the groups. By following a few relatively simple steps (omitting the pre-procedural imaging, removing grid from the X-ray detector and using very low frame rates) CB ablation could be performed with ultralow radiation exposure without compromising the safety of efficacy of the procedure. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1875-8312 1569-5794 1875-8312 1573-0743 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10554-022-02717-6 |