Anastomotic leak and cancer-specific outcomes after curative rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-specific outcomes after curative rectal cancer surgery comparing anastomotic leak (AL) with no leak. Methods PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify studies comparing cancer-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Techniques in coloproctology Vol. 24; no. 6; pp. 513 - 525 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01-06-2020
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-specific outcomes after curative rectal cancer surgery comparing anastomotic leak (AL) with no leak.
Methods
PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify studies comparing cancer-specific outcomes after rectal cancer surgery in patients with AL and without. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) for each outcome measure.
Results
A total of 18 studies were included for meta-analysis, comprising a total of 18,039 patients after curative rectal resection (1764 AL, 16,275 without AL). The overall rate of AL was 9.8%. After AL and excluding 30-day mortality there was an increased risk of local recurrence (OR 1.50; CI 1.23, 1.82), worse overall survival (OR 0.69; CI 0.60–0.81), decreased disease free survival (OR 0.51; CI 0.36–0.73) and cancer specific survival (OR 0.71; CI 0.54–0.94). Distant recurrence (OR 1.10; CI 0.89–1.37) and overall recurrence (OR 1.33; CI 0.64–2.76) were not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusions
AL may negatively impact cancer-specific outcomes after curative rectal cancer surgery and could be considered an independent negative prognostic factor. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-4 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 1123-6337 1128-045X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10151-020-02153-5 |