Spatiotemporal variability of fall daily maximum flows in southern Quebec (Canada) from 1930 to 2018

Quebec is experiencing a significant increase in summer and fall temperatures and rainfall. This study compares the spatiotemporal variability of maximum daily flows generated by rainfall during the fall season (September–December) in relation to this climatic change and physiographic and land use f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of flood risk management Vol. 17; no. 2
Main Author: Assani, Ali A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2024
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Quebec is experiencing a significant increase in summer and fall temperatures and rainfall. This study compares the spatiotemporal variability of maximum daily flows generated by rainfall during the fall season (September–December) in relation to this climatic change and physiographic and land use factors. Analysis of the spatial variability of these maximum flows measured from 1930 to 2018 in 17 watersheds revealed that the magnitude of flows is approximately twice as low on the north shore as it is on the south shore south of 47° N. This difference is explained by three main factors: wetlands (negative correlation) and agricultural (positive correlation) surface area, and summer–fall total precipitation (positive correlation). As for the temporal variability of flows, the different Mann–Kendall statistical tests showed a significant increase in flows due to increased rainfall. The increase of flows was more widespread on the north shore than on the south because the storage capacity of wetlands and other water bodies does not change over time to store excess rainfall. On the south shore, the increase in flows over time is limited due to the significant reduction in agricultural areas since the modernization of agriculture. This reduction favored infiltration to the detriment of runoff.
ISSN:1753-318X
1753-318X
DOI:10.1111/jfr3.12971