Comparison of solar dryer and solar-assisted heat pump dryer for cassava

•A solar dryer (SD) and solar-assisted heat pump dryer (SAHPD) for cassava were investigated.•The drying rate of cassava using SAHPD is higher than SD.•Thermal and pick-up efficiencies were lower in SD compared to SAHPD.•The solar fraction was higher in SD compared to SAHPD.•The average COP of the h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Solar energy Vol. 136; pp. 606 - 613
Main Authors: Yahya, M., Fudholi, Ahmad, Hafizh, Hadyan, Sopian, Kamaruzzaman
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Elsevier Ltd 15-10-2016
Pergamon Press Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A solar dryer (SD) and solar-assisted heat pump dryer (SAHPD) for cassava were investigated.•The drying rate of cassava using SAHPD is higher than SD.•Thermal and pick-up efficiencies were lower in SD compared to SAHPD.•The solar fraction was higher in SD compared to SAHPD.•The average COP of the heat pump was 3.38 from 3.23 to 3.47. The performance of a solar dryer (SD) and a solar-assisted heat pump dryer (SAHPD) for drying of cassava chips have been investigated. The SD and SAHPD decreased the mass of cassava from 30.8kg to 17.4kg within 13 and 9h at average temperatures of 40°C and 45°C, respectively. The moisture content of cassava decreased from 61% (wet basis) to 10.5%, with a mass flow rate of 0.124kg/s. The average thermal efficiencies were 25.6% and 30.9% for SD and SAHPD respectively. The average drying rate (DR) and specific moisture extraction rate (SMER) were 1.33kg/h and 0.38kg/kWh, respectively, for SD as well as 1.93kg/h and 0.47kg/kWh, respectively, for SAHPD. The pick-up efficiencies varied from 3.9% to 65.8% and 15.9% to 70.4% for SD and SAHPD, with average values of 39.3% and 43.6%, respectively. The average solar fractions were 66.7% for SD and 44.6% for SAHPD. The coefficient of performance of the heat pump ranged from 3.23 to 3.47, with an average of 3.38.
ISSN:0038-092X
1471-1257
DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2016.07.049