Allowance for antibody bivalence in the determination of association rate constants by kinetic exclusion assay

This investigation completes the amendment of theoretical expressions for the characterization of antigen–antibody interactions by kinetic exclusion assay—an endeavor that has been marred by inadequate allowance for the consequences of antibody bivalence in its uptake by the affinity matrix (immobil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Analytical biochemistry Vol. 441; no. 2; pp. 214 - 217
Main Author: Winzor, Donald J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 15-10-2013
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This investigation completes the amendment of theoretical expressions for the characterization of antigen–antibody interactions by kinetic exclusion assay—an endeavor that has been marred by inadequate allowance for the consequences of antibody bivalence in its uptake by the affinity matrix (immobilized antigen) that is used to ascertain the fraction of free antibody sites in a solution with defined total concentrations of antigen and antibody. A simple illustration of reacted site probability considerations in action confirms that the square root of the fluorescence response ratio, RAg/Ro, needs to be taken in order to determine the fraction of unoccupied antibody sites, which is the parameter employed to describe the kinetics of antigen uptake in the mixture of antigen and antibody with defined initial composition. The approximately 2-fold underestimation of the association rate constant (ka) that emanates from the usual practice of omitting the square root factor gives rise to a corresponding overestimate of the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd)—a situation that is also encountered in the thermodynamic characterization of antigen–antibody interactions by kinetic exclusion assay.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2013.06.020
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-2697
1096-0309
DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2013.06.020