A focussed single-view hand-held echocardiography protocol for the detection of rheumatic heart disease

• Published in: Cardiology in the young Vol. 28; no. 1; p. 108
• Main Authors: Diamantino, Adriana, Beaton, Andrea, Aliku, Twalib, Oliveira, Kaciane, Oliveira, Cassio, Xavier, Luciana, Perlman, Lindsay, Okello, Emmy, Nascimento, Bruno, Ribeiro, Antonio L P, Nunes, Maria C P, Sable, Craig
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-01-2018
• Subjects: Adolescent; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging; Child; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - instrumentation; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods; False Negative Reactions; Female; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging; Retrospective Studies; Rheumatic Heart Disease - diagnostic imaging; Sensitivity and Specificity; hand-held echocardiography; task shifting; Rheumatic heart disease
• ISSN: 1467-1107
• DOI: 10.1017/S1047951117001676

Echocardiographic screening represents an opportunity for reduction in the global burden of rheumatic heart disease. A focussed single-view screening protocol could allow for the rapid training of healthcare providers and screening of patients.
The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a focussed single-view hand-held echocardiographic protocol for the diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease in children.
A total of nine readers were divided into three reading groups; each interpreted 200 hand-held echocardiography studies retrospectively as screen-positive, if mitral regurgitation ⩾1.5 cm and/or any aortic insufficiency were observed, or screen-negative from a pooled study library. The performance of experts receiving focussed hand-held protocols, non-experts receiving focussed hand-held protocols, and experts receiving complete hand-held protocols were determined in comparison with consensus interpretations on fully functional echocardiography machines.
In all, 587 studies including 76 on definite rheumatic heart disease, 122 on borderline rheumatic heart disease, and 389 on normal cases were available for analysis. The focussed single-view protocol had a sensitivity of 81.1%, specificity of 75.5%, negative predictive value of 88.5%, and a positive predictive value of 63.2%; expert readers had higher specificity (86.1 versus 64.8%, p<0.01) but equal sensitivity. Sensitivity - experts, 96% and non-experts, 95% - and negative predictive value - experts, 99% and non-experts, 98% - were better for definite rheumatic heart disease. False-positive screening studies resulting from erroneous identification of mitral regurgitation and aortic insufficiency colour jets increased with shortened protocols and less experience (p<0.01).
Our data support a focussed screening protocol limited to parasternal long-axis images. This holds promise in making echocardiographic screening more practical in regions where rheumatic heart disease remains endemic.