The effect of soft-start polymerization by second generation LEDs on the degree of conversion of resin composite

Fourier-Transform (FT)--Raman spectroscopy was used to evaluate in vitro the degree of conversion (DC) of Charisma dental composite cured by three different light curing units (LCUs) using soft-start and normal protocols. Eighty circular blocks of resin (7 mm in diameter x 2.5 mm thick) were prepare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Operative dentistry Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 160 - 165
Main Authors: Soares, L E S, Liporoni, P C S, Martin, A A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01-03-2007
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Fourier-Transform (FT)--Raman spectroscopy was used to evaluate in vitro the degree of conversion (DC) of Charisma dental composite cured by three different light curing units (LCUs) using soft-start and normal protocols. Eighty circular blocks of resin (7 mm in diameter x 2.5 mm thick) were prepared and cured using the following sources: halogen light (Degulux soft-start, n = 20, G1-G2), low power light emitting diode (LED) with transparent polymer tip (LD13, n = 20, G3-G4) and fiber optic tip (LD13, n = 20, G5-G6) and, finally, high power LED (Radii, n = 20, G7-G8). The top and bottom surfaces of the blocks were analyzed by FT-Raman spectroscopy. The respective DCs were estimated calculating the peak height ratio of the aliphatic C=C (1640 cm(-1)) and aromatic C=C (1610 cm(-1)) Raman modes. The DC at the surfaces ranged between 50% and 60% for the top and 46% and 58% for the bottom. The halogen light and high power LED LCUs with the soft-start and normal protocols produced the highest DC values of dental composite at both surfaces (p < 0.001). Curing by low power LED in the soft-start protocol did not produce adequate DC at the depth of 2.5 mm. The type of LCU light guide tip did not present a significant statistical difference in the final DC of the dental composite (p > 0.05).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0361-7734
1559-2863
DOI:10.2341/06-45