Neonatologists’ preferences regarding guidelines for periviable deliveries: do we really know what we want?
Objective To examine neonatology providers’ preferences regarding periviability guidelines. Study design An online cross-sectional survey of American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine members. Results Most of the 480 respondents desired standardized guidelines for upper (8...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of perinatology Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 445 - 452 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01-03-2019
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
To examine neonatology providers’ preferences regarding periviability guidelines.
Study design
An online cross-sectional survey of American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine members.
Results
Most of the 480 respondents desired standardized guidelines for upper (85%) and lower (87%) gestational age limits for offering resuscitation and comfort care. Standardization was most to least frequently desired at the national, institutional, and regional levels. Within scenarios involving parents’ preferences conflicting with institutional guidelines, respondents chose parent-preferred options more often (66 vs. 34%). Overall, resuscitation (48%) versus comfort care (52%) were nearly equally chosen. In emergency scenarios, more versus less experienced respondents favored parent-preferred options over guidelines (55 vs. 46%,
p
= 0.003) and chose resuscitation over comfort care (50 vs. 36%,
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
Neonatal providers desire age-based periviability guidelines, but do not agree on the level of standardization. Such limits may be insufficient to guide clinical practice. Policies should include processes that direct providers through fair transparent decision-making. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0743-8346 1476-5543 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41372-019-0313-1 |