Analysing limitations of the FlowCyl as a one-point viscometer test for cement paste

•The average difference between experimental and numerical flow resistance ratio is 6.5% and 4.6%.•All measurements collapse on the same curve in the flow resistance ratio vs. plastic viscosity plot.•Flow resistance ratio can characterize cement pastes if the superplasticiser dosage is constant. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Construction & building materials Vol. 218; pp. 333 - 340
Main Authors: Cepuritis, Rolands, Skare, Elisabeth L., Ramenskiy, Evgeny, Mørtsell, Ernst, Smeplass, Sverre, Li, Shizhao, Jacobsen, Stefan, Spangenberg, Jon
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 10-09-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The average difference between experimental and numerical flow resistance ratio is 6.5% and 4.6%.•All measurements collapse on the same curve in the flow resistance ratio vs. plastic viscosity plot.•Flow resistance ratio can characterize cement pastes if the superplasticiser dosage is constant. The FlowCyl is a simple flow viscometer – a modification of the Marsh Cone test apparatus – developed to quantify the flow behaviour of cement pastes. The FlowCyl gives a one-parameter characterisation of rheology called the flow resistance ratio or λQ, which is defined as the average ratio between the flow loss of a measured fluid and theoretical flow of an ideal fluid. This paper reports a study on the limitations of the FlowCyl and appurtenant flow resistance ratio. The investigation includes rheological measurements of cement pastes incorporating crushed aggregate fines with a diameter below 125 µm and development of a numerical model in order to analyse the flow condition inside the FlowCyl. The numerical simulations are carried out both with the Bingham- and Herschel-Bulkley material model of the rheometer data. A comparison with the experimental λQ results illustrates that only a minor error is introduced when describing the flow of cement paste in the FlowCyl with a two-parameter model (Bingham material model) as compared to a three-parameter model (Hershel-Bulkley model). The results also show that the one-parameter characterisation (i.e. λQ) mainly correlates to the plastic viscosity in the Bingham material model, while the yield stress only correlates if the dosage of superplasticizer per mass of cement is kept constant. The numerical simulations show that high shear rates at the outlet of the FlowCyl are responsible for the difference in the correlations.
ISSN:0950-0618
1879-0526
DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.127